Novel 3D in situ visualization of seal heartworm (Acanthocheilonema spirocauda) larvae in the seal louse (Echinophthirius horridus) by X

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 14078 (2022) Cite this article

1330 Accesses

2 Citations

13 Altmetric

Metrics details

The seal heartworm Acanthocheilonema spirocauda (Nematoda: Onchocercidae) parasitizes the heart and pulmonary arteries of various phocid seals of the Northern Hemisphere. Over many decades, potential vectors of this parasite have been discussed, and to this date, the life cycle is not fully known. The seal louse Echinophthirius horridus (Anoplura: Echinophthiriidae) is an obligatory, permanent and haematophagous ectoparasite of phocids that has been hypothesized to function as obligate intermediate host for A. spirocauda. We examined 11 adult E. horridus specimens collected from stranded harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) in rehabilitation at the Sealcentre Pieterburen by X-ray microCT imaging, aiming to illustrate larval A. spirocauda infection sites in situ. In three of these specimens, thread-like larvae were detected in insect organs. Detailed imaging of the most infected louse revealed a total of 54 A. spirocauda larvae located either in fat bodies or the haemocoel. Histological analysis of the same specimen illustrated nematode cross-sections, confirming X-ray microCT data. The current data strongly suggest that E. horridus is a natural intermediate host for A. spirocauda. Moreover, we demonstrate the potential of X-ray microCT-based imaging as a non-destructive method to analyze host-parasite interactions, especially in the neglected field of marine mammal parasitology.

Acanthocheilonema spirocauda (Leidy, 1858) Anderson, 1992 is an angiotropic marine parasitic nematode of the family Onchocercidae (superfamily Filarioidea)1 that parasitizes a broad range of phocid seal species in the Northern Hemisphere, including harbour seals (Phoca vitulina), ringed seals (Pusa hispida) and the endangered Mediterranean monk seals (Monachus monachus)2,3. In the final hosts, adult A. spirocauda mainly reside in the right ventricle and atrium of the heart and in the pulmonary arteries, reaching a body length of more than 20 cm1,2,3,4,5,6. Epidemiological studies on A. spirocauda infections in free-ranging P. vitulina in the Wadden sea showed varying prevalences (32%7, 25%4, 6%5 and 4%6). A. spirocauda infections are predominantly reported in immature seals4,5,6,8,9 and do not seem to significantly affect the health status of the animals5,6. However, low prevalences of A. spirocauda infections in older seals4,5 could result from a high mortality in severely infected young seals1,10. A. spirocauda-associated lesions have been described in parasitized hearts, even with fatal consequences5,10. For example, Lehnert et al.5 reported a perforation of the right atrium with marked pericardial effusion as the cause of death in a severely infected harbour seal.

Over many decades, transmission pathways and potential natural intermediate hosts of A. spirocauda have been discussed, however, the full life cycle is not yet completely known (for a review, see Leidenberger et al.1). Adult female A. spirocauda are viviparous and release microfilariae into the bloodstream of final hosts1. Diaplacental transmission of microfilariae has been suggested, but due to low infection rates in adult seals this pathway does not seem to play a major role1. Consistently, it was hypothesized that the haematophagous marine seal louse, Echinophthirius horridus (von Olfers, 1816) Fahrenholz, 1919 (Anoplura: Echinophthiriidae) (Fig. 1), might be the natural obligate intermediate host of this filarioid nematode1,11. Representatives of the family Echinophthiriidae are obligatory and permanent ectoparasitic insects12 and, in contrast to terrestrial anoplurans, they are highly adapted to marine environments13. While various echinophthiriid species share a strict host specificity, the seal louse E. horridus shows a rather broad host range by infesting eight different phocid seal species, including harbour seals and ringed seals12. Similar to A. spirocauda, E. horridus is also restricted to the Northern Hemisphere12 and mainly occurs in immature seals6. Due to their obligate and permanent haematophagous feeding habits, echinophthiriid species are likely to transmit and spread vector-borne bacteria, such as Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Bartonella henselae, Mycoplasma sp., Rickettsia sp., and Salmonella enteritidis in free-living pinniped populations14,15,16,17.

Stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of the seal louse, Echinophthirius horridus. (a) Dorsal and (b) ventral view of the heavily infected female louse with a plump gravid abdominal area. (c) Eversible proboscis evolved for haematophagous life style. (d) Modified setae as sensorial organs located on the cuticular. Scale bars: (a, b) 500 µm, (c, d) 50 µm.

Filarioid nematodes affecting humans and terrestrial mammals all share obligate heteroxenous life cycles involving haematophagous ectoparasites as intermediate hosts18. Within the genus Acanthocheilonema, most representatives parasitize subcutaneous tissues and abdominal cavities of mammalian hosts, and a broad range of competent arthropod vectors has been reported, including ticks (e.g. Ornithodorus tartakovskyi for A. vitae in rodents19), louse flies (e.g. Hippobosca longipennis for A. dracunculoides in dogs20) and even chewing and anopluran lice (e.g. Heterodoxus spiniger and Linognathus setosus for A. reconditum in dogs21). Nonetheless, very little is known on intermediate hosts of filarioid parasites circulating in marine mammals1,17,22.

Since early studies from the nineteen sixties/seventies failed to detect A. spirocauda stages in E. horridus, Culex pipiens mosquitoes and simuliid blackflies were consequently assumed as potential vectors10,23. In 1981, Geraci et al.24, for the first time, succeeded to detect different larval stages of A. spirocauda in dissected E. horridus specimens. They found A. spirocauda larvae in 70 of 102 lice obtained from one stranded P. vitulina, which also showed microfilaremia. The authors described four larval stages [microfilariae, first-stage larvae (L1), second-stage larvae (L2) and third-stage larvae (L3)], which differed in size and morphology and were localized in the fat body, the gastrointestinal tract, the haemocoel, the claws and the head of dissected lice specimens24. In the following years, Dailey and Fallace25 presented a significant correlation between natural seal heartworm infections and seal lice infestations in harbour seals and Lehnert et al.6 found a single A. spirocauda larva during dissection of 35 adult seal lice. The recent molecular diagnosis of A. spirocauda in E. horridus lice strongly supported the hypothesis of E. horridus vector capacity17,26. Nevertheless, the study of Geraci et al.24 constitutes the most detailed analysis on different larval stages and their development in E. horridus lice, thereby representing the most convincing support of this hypothesis until today.

For the detection of protozoan and metazoan parasites inside arthropod tissue, ectoparasites can be screened in different ways, including dissections6,20,21,24, pathohistological examinations27, and the use of molecular methods17,26. In recent years, X-ray microCT imaging technique as a non-invasive and non-destructive method has been applied to reveal new three-dimensional insights into host-parasite relations28,29,30,31. However, up to date, studies in medical and veterinary parasitology using this imaging technique are rare32. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to contribute to explore the role of E. horridus as an intermediate host of A. spirocauda by using 3D X-ray microCT imaging. Using this non-destructive technology, we screened adult E. horridus specimens from naturally infested harbour seals during their rehabilitation at Sealcentre Pieterburen for the presence and in situ localization of different larval stages of A. spirocauda. The three-dimensional visualization of different larval stages and their tissue-related assignment should help to clarify distinct steps within the heteroxenous life cycle of A. spirocauda and the general role of E. horridus as intermediate host within marine ecosystems.

For X-ray microCT imaging, a total of 11 adult Echinophthirius horridus lice were selected out of a pool of various preserved specimens (n = 53), which all originated from different, originally free-living, stranded harbour seals during their rehabilitation period at the Sealcentre Pieterburen, the Netherlands. Thus, the actual infection status of preserved E. horridus specimens was unknown. Moreover, no information on the Acanthocheilonema spirocauda infection status of the seals (or on the presence of microfilaremia) was available at the time of experimental setting initiation. However, Hirzmann et al.17 meanwhile proved the presence of A. spirocauda-DNA in the same pool of sampled E. horridus lice. The individual selection of adult female specimens for 3D imaging was based on morphological aspects (plump abdominal area, typical two pairs of gonopods, and a body length of more than 2.5 mm) to increase the chance of screening lice, which had extensively sucked seal blood.

In a first experiment, 11 female E. horridus were screened to obtain an overview on arthropod morphology as well as the anatomical features, location and measures of organs. Since this study constitutes, to our best knowledge, the first X-ray microCT imaging analysis of echinophthiriid lice, measurements and morphological details of various organs of different E. horridus specimens were compared. Taking into account known microhabitats of A. spirocauda larvae inside E. horridus24, particularly subcuticular fat bodies and the haemocoel of lice were carefully inspected. We found irregularities in fat body densities in three of 11 E. horridus specimen (27%). By 3D reconstruction, these heterogeneous inclusions in fat bodies were reconstructed as thread-like, often sausage-shaped structures clearly discriminable from surrounding insect tissue. Based on the molecular genetic evidence of A. spirocauda in the same pool of sampled seal lice17 as main diagnostic and identification criterion, these structures were interpreted as A. spirocauda larvae.

In the second phase of this study, one female E. horridus individual presenting conspicuous larval structures in insect organs was subjected to high resolution imaging (Figs. 2, 3; Supplementary Video 1). In total, 54 A. spirocauda larvae ranging from 76 to 1527 µm total body length were detected, of which 45 larvae (83%) were found enclosed and encapsulated in fat bodies and measured between 76 and 779 µm in length. Only two fat-body localized larvae reached a body length over 600 µm (Fig. 3). In general, A. spirocauda larvae present in fat bodies appeared strongly contorted and showed a typical sausage-shape (Fig. 4). Nine larvae (17%) were located freely in the haemocoel and showed body lengths of 615–1527 µm (Fig. 3). Overall, the longest larval stages showed a body length of > 1000 µm (1122–1527 µm, n = 7) and were exclusively located in the haemocoel of the seal louse.

X-ray microCT imaging analysis and 3D reconstruction of Echinophthirius horridus, with various Acanthocheilonema spirocauda larvae (colored, string to sausage-shaped structures) in different body layers. In situ visualization. (a) Ventral view. (b) Lateral view (c). Caudal view. Scale bars: 500 µm. Abbreviations: a = alimentary tract, cd = caudal, cr = cranial, lfb = larvae contorted in the fat body, lh = larvae located in the haemocoel, m = musculature, r = reproductive tract (nits/eggs), sha = setae modified to hairs, tpl = third pair of legs.

3D reconstruction of Echinophthirius horridus based on X-ray microCT showing Acanthocheilonema spirocauda larvae ordered by body length. (a) Ventral view. (b) Lateral view. (c) Caudal view. (d) Overview of larval localization in relation to body length. Scale bars: 500 µm.

3D reconstruction of fat body element of Echinophthirius horridus. (a) Yellow marked fat body, (b) revealing a plump, sausage-shaped Acanthocheilonema spirocauda larva (potentially L1-stage) inside. (c) Isolated fat body, containing A. spirocauda larva. Scale bars: 100 µm. Abbreviations: cu = cuticle, fb = fat body, sha = setae modified to hairs.

To confirm that thread-like structures observed by X-ray microCT imaging in fact were A. spirocauda larvae, the heavily infected E. horridus individual was subjected to histological analysis. Using semi-thin sections, conspicuous areas in E. horridus fat bodies and haemocoel indeed revealed multiple capsule-like structures containing nematode cross-sections. Nematode cuticula and inner larval organs could be identified, including alimentary tract, musculature and lateral chords (Figs. 5, 6), thereby delivering final evidence on the presence of A. spirocauda larvae inside E. horridus and confirming X-ray microCT analyses.

X-ray microCT images with marked larval structures and histological cross-sections. Scale bars: 100 µm. Abbreviations: cu = louse cuticle, fb = fat body, ha = haemocoel, lfb = larvae contorted in the fat body, lh = larvae located in the haemocoel, m = musculature, sha = setae modified to hairs.

Histological cross-sections showing multiple Acanthocheilonema spirocauda larvae encapsulated in fat bodies. Scale bars: (a, b) 50 µm, (c) 20 µm. Abbreviations: a = nematode alimentary tract, ca = capsule, cu = nematode cuticle, fb = fat body, lc = nematode lateral chords, lfb = larvae contorted in the fat body, m = nematode musculature.

To date, only few studies suggested a role of Echinophthirius horridus as obligate intermediate host in the heteroxenous life cycle of Acanthocheilonema spirocauda. This was based on the morphological detection of different larval nematode stages (i. e microfilariae, L1, L2, L3) during dissections of E. horridus specimens6,24, a significant statistical correlation between infestations with seal lice and infections with heartworms in harbour seals25, and a molecular xeno-monitoring of A. spirocauda in E. horridus17,26. For the first time, we here used X-ray microCT imaging to three-dimensionally visualize stages of A. spirocauda larvae in their in situ microhabitats inside the seal louse. Thereby, larval stages exhibiting different length and localizations were detected, showing that this nematode parasite is capable to develop into up to 1527 µm long stages inside the seal louse. Our results support the role of E. horridus as an obligate intermediate host of A. spirocauda in the marine ecosystem, thereby playing an essential role in pathogen transmission and maintenance of acanthocheilonemosis in free-ranging seal populations.

Using non-invasive X-ray microCT imaging, various worm-like structures inside different organs of E. horridus were illustrated. Histological examination of the same specimen confirmed X-ray microCT-based diagnosis and proved that these thread-like structures in the fat body and haemocoel were indeed nematode larvae. Thereby, the identification of detected nematodes as A. spirocauda was conducted on the basis of following knowledge: (i) E. horridus specimens analyzed in this study were sampled during a monitoring study on vector-borne pathogens in seal lice and the presence of A. spirocauda-DNA in the same pool of E. horridus specimens has been confirmed17. Beside the development of a specific nested PCR for the detection of A. spirocauda, Hirzmann et al.17 screened various E. horridus pools using pan-filarial primers for a broad spectrum of filarial nematodes33 and no other filarioid species or mix-infections could be detected17 Thereby, this molecular genetic evidence was used as main diagnostic criterion for identification of A. spirocauda in the present study. (ii) A. spirocauda is a common endoparasite of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and the only described angiotropic filarioid nematode species infecting harbour seals in the Wadden sea4,5,6,7. (iii) Dirofilaria immitis, another filarioid nematode18, was described in P. vitulina before34, but has never been detected in this host in the Wadden sea. Additionally, D. immitis is well known to be transmitted by mosquitoes35 and has never been detected in echinophthiriid lice17.

The potential of X-ray microCT as a method to visualize and analyze host-parasite interactions in a non-invasive and non-destructive manner has already been demonstrated by other studies28,29,30,31. We highlight these advantages on the example of an echinophthiriid louse, to our best knowledge, for first time in this study. Thereby, our data clearly show that non-invasive 3D imaging reveals insights into detailed anatomical structures of an insect ectoparasite and its potential pathogen fauna, while completely preserving insect morphology. However, distinct analyzation of (inner) larval morphology, stage classification or even species identification is not possible with this method. Utilizing the non-invasive and non-destructive aspect of this imaging technology, these disadvantages and limitations could be equalized by combining X-ray microCT with other diagnostic methods, like dissections of lice and exact morphological identification and characterization of larvae via light microscopy. So far, X-ray microCT analyses have rarely been used in medical and veterinary parasitology32. Moreover, the vector role of most echinophthiriid species constitutes a neglected research topic in the field of marine mammal parasitology worldwide17, even though their obligatory, permanent, and haematophagous modus vivendi is eminently suitable for pathogen transmission. We demonstrate the potential of non-invasive 3D X-ray microCT imaging for pathogen screening in ectoparasites, which may be applied to a broad spectrum of investigations in veterinary and medical entomology.

Geraci et al.24 provided the strongest evidence for E. horridus as an intermediate host for A. spirocauda. They detected A. spirocauda larvae in 70 of 102 dissected seal lice and classified these larval stages as microfilariae, L1, L2 and L3, based on body length and other morphological features24. Overlapping lengths in reference measurements and highly variable larval lengths in the current study did not allow for developmental stage identification in this analysis. Furthermore, distinct morphological parameters used for larval stage identification like a cephalic knob in L1, distinct inner structures like oesophagus in L2, or papilla-like structures at the posterior end of L324, could not be detected by the employed imaging technique, thus hampering stage identification. Interestingly, in the current study, 16 larvae (ranging from 76–195 µm in length) were shorter than 197 µm, a measured value defined as minimal body length of A. spirocauda-L1 by Geraci et al.24. L1-stages were also defined as “sausage” stage24, a term which is known from other filarioid nematodes as well, e.g. D. immitis35. However, the larval length may also have been influenced by fixation or staining. For example, after E. horridus dissection, Geraci et al.24 kept larval stages in physiological saline, while E. horridus specimens in this study were fixed in 80% ethanol and stained with Lugol’s solution. Both compounds are known to cause tissue shrinkage. Because our data were not corrected for shrinkage, the presented larval length data should be interpreted with caution. However, based on our data, X-ray microCT imaging constitutes a suitable tool to detect short larvae, which could potentially be overlooked or damaged during stereomicroscopy-guided dissections of lice. Moreover, Geraci et al.24 measured 2% formalin-fixed microfilarial stages obtained from a microfilaremic harbour seal24. The stages were exclusively found in the gastrointestinal tract of the examined specimens24. Based on these observations, it is possible that larval stages located in fat bodies, as found in the current study, are L1-stages.

Demonstrating a high A. spirocauda larval burden (54 larvae in a single female louse), the current data highlight the enormous role of echinophthiriid lice for effective pathogen transmission. Compared to data from Geraci et al.24, the specimen analyzed in the present study represents a highly infected seal louse. With respect to mean parasite burden, Geraci et al.24 reported that 87% of infected E. horridus harboured 4.6 L1 stages, 54% showed 3.0 L3 stages, and 26% showed 1.4 L2 stages. Further, the authors described the fat body of the seal louse as main localization of A. spirocauda larvae, however, larvae were also found in the gastrointestinal tract, haemocoel, claws and head of E. horridus specimens24. In the present study, we found larval structures exclusively in fat bodies and the haemocoel of E. horridus. Six larvae revealed a body length of > 1170 µm and, when following the classification criteria by Geraci et al.24, may be classified as L3. Interestingly, these large and coiled larvae were exclusively found in the haemocoel.

Including previous reports of A. spirocauda in seal lice6,17,24,26 and data of other filarioid parasites35,36,37,38, the results of the current study contribute to further unravel the life cycle of this nematode in its proposed intermediate host. After A. spirocauda ingestion by E. horridus via a blood meal, microfilariae necessarily have to leave the alimentary tract for further development, as it is well-known for other filarioid nematodes, e.g. D. immitis, D. repens, or lymphathic filarial species35,36,37. Otherwise, non-migrating stages will be excreted by insect host. While penetrating middle gut membranes, micro-lesions and tissue damage could occur, as it was reported for membrane lesions in the vector Aedes aegypti caused by microfilariae of lympathic filariae Brugia malayi39. For Dirofilaria spp., Malpighian tubules of mosquito vector constitute favored migration site of L1 and L2 stages35, while thoracic musculature was reported as preferred microhabitat for lympathic filarial parasites after migration from the middle gut37,38. Fat bodies of E. horridus seem to represent a preferred microhabitat for, especially early, A. spirocauda larval stages, as it was reported by Geraci et al.24. This effect was also shown in the current study, revealing that the majority of larvae (83%) were localized in fat bodies, while only two of them reached a body length over 600 µm. Similar to other filarioids, it has been shown that A. spirocauda stages perform enormous length growth in its potential vector. Geraci et al.24 reported on up to the tenfold length of infectious L3 stages compared to ingested microfilariae/L1 stages. Considering very short stages detected in the current study, the longest larva in the current study (1527 µm) reached the 20-fold length of the smallest stage located in the fat body (76 µm). However, for transmission to seals during E. horridus haematophagy, larvae have to further migrate into the louse proboscis as it is known for other vectors35. As it was reported for lympharial filarial taxa38, L3 stages of A. spirocauda were described as very active with vigorous movements24, indicating an effective migration mobility out of abdominal area in the louse proboscis for transmission to seal final host.

In the past, low prevalences of E. horridus infestations (4%5 and 3%6) and A. spirocauda infections (6%5 and 4%6) in stranded harbour seals in the German Wadden sea have been reported. However, Lehnert et al.6 reported a distinct prevalence increase of both pathogens in stranded harbour seals in the last year of the study (2013) that calls for further monitoring. Since most studies reporting on low E. horridus prevalences5,6 or even no ectoparasite findings4,7,8 are based on necropsies of stranded harbour seals, it should be considered, that lice could leave their host after death40. Thereby, future prevalence studies based on examinations of free-living or stranded seals during rehabilitation periods in wildlife rescue centers could help to better understand the in vivo-occurrence of this ectoparasitosis.

Among echinophthiriid lice, only few species have been examined for their vector function so far14,15,16,17. Up to date, E. horridus has been the only echinophthiriid species suspected to function as intermediate host for a metazoan parasite species, namely the filarioid nematode A. spirocauda1,24. Nonetheless, another echinophthiriid species may also be involved in A. spirocauda life cycle as well, such as Lepidophthirus piriformis, which specifically infests Mediterranean monk seals in Europe. This seal species was recently recorded as new host for A. spirocauda, since two adult nematodes were found in the right ventricle of a stranded animal3. However, no ectoparasites were detected in this case report3. Another closely related marine filarioid nematode, namely A. odendhali, parasitizes within intermuscular fasciae and body cavities of otariid pinnipeds, such as the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus), the Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) and the Northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus). It is mainly considered as non-pathogenic but will also include haematophagous invertebrates as intermediate hosts22,41. However, the life cycle of A. odendhali is entirely unknown, whereby blood-sucking ectoparasites have been suggested as obligate intermediate host22,41. Moreover, California sea lions and Steller sea lions are final hosts for the echinophthiriid louse Antarctophthirus microchir12, which, so far, has never been examined for its potential role in pathogen transmission. Interestingly, free-ranging and captive California sea lions, as well as other otariids and phocids, also revealed susceptible for infections with D. immitis34,41. Based on the broad range of transmission hypotheses, future studies on the vector role of other echinophthiriid species are urgently needed to extend the current knowledge on arthropod-borne diseases in pinniped species within the highly complex marine environment.

Echinophthirius horridus specimens were sampled in the framework of a past large-scale monitoring study on vector-borne pathogens in the Sealcentre Pieterburen, Netherlands, in mid 201217. Sampling exclusively took place during routine clinical diagnostic procedures on stranded harbour seals, which were admitted for a rehabilitation period. Using lice combs and forceps, E. horridus specimen were removed from the seal fur and thereafter immediately stored in 80% EtOH for further investigations. Admission and rehabilitation procedures of different seal species at the Sealcentre Pieterburen were authorized by the government of the Netherlands (permission ID at time of sample-taking: FF/75/2012/015).

Sample preparation included iodine staining and mounting of lice and followed established protocols42 with minor modifications. Lice were fixed in 80% EtOH. Prior to staining, specimens were washed in distilled water twice for one hour to remove ethanol remnants. Thereafter, lice were placed in 1% Lugol's I2KI solution (Gatt-Koller, Absam, Austria) for 24 h. Finally, specimens were washed twice in distilled water for one hour.

For mounting, 200 μl pipette tips (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) were heat-sealed at the tip and filled with low-melting agarose (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). Agarose was heated until viscosity allowed filling the pipette tip. Subsequently, stained lice were mounted into the pipette tip (3–4 specimen per tip) using dissection needles. Tight distances between specimens were important in order to image four specimens within one field of view, while points of contact were avoided.

All microCT scans were acquired using an XRadia MicroXCT-400 (Carl Zeiss X-ray Microscopy, Pleasanton, CA, USA). In a first step, overview scans were acquired using the 4X detector assembly (no detector binning) with an X-ray source voltage of 60kVp and a current of 133 µA. The emitted X-ray spectrum was filtered with the Zeiss LE2 filter. Projection images were recorded over a 360° rotation with an exposure time of 30 s and an angular increment of 0.225° between projections. The FOV of overview scans was roughly 5 × 5 mm, and covered all louse specimens in the pipette tip. Isotropic voxel resolution in reconstructed volumes of overview scans varied between 2.24 µm and 2.69 µm. Based on the analysis of overview scans, a high-resolution scan from the abdomen of one specimen was acquired using the 10X detector assembly (no detector binning) with an X-ray source voltage of 40kVp and a current of 200µA (no X-ray filter). Projection images were recorded over a 360° rotation with an exposure time of 45 s and an angular increment of 0.225° between projections. Isotropic voxel resolution in the reconstructed volume of the high-resolution scan was 1.09 µm. All image volumes were saved in DICOM format.

Overview scans were inspected for the presence of nematode larvae using FIJI imageJ43. The high-resolution scan of one louse abdomen was imported into the 3D software package Amira 2019.4 (FEI SAS, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific). For noise reduction, the image volume was filtered with two steps of 3D bilateral filtering (step 1: kernel = 3 × 3 × 3, similarity = 20,000; step 2: kernel = 3 × 3 × 3, similarity = 40,000) followed by one step of 3D Gaussian filtering (kernel size factor = 2, standard deviation = 1). Nematode larvae were manually segmented using the Segmentation Editor. Based on the segmentation masks, the Distance-Ordered Thinner tool (Len of Ends = 8) followed by the Trace Lines tool were used for skeletonization in order to extract a spatial graph for each larva. Spatial graphs were smoothed using the Smooth Line Set tool (smoothing = 0.8, adhere to original data = 0.05, number of iterations = 100). Finally, we used the Spatial Graph Statistics tool to measure lengths of spatial graphs. For visualization, we used both surfaces generated from the segmentation masks together with volume rendering of the louse abdomen, as well as a visualization of spatial graphs colour-coded for length.

For histological analyses, the specimen was cut into two pieces approximately in the thorax region to ensure proper resin infiltration. The obtained pieces were afterwards dehydrated in an acidified dimethoxypropane solution, followed by several rinses in pure acetone before infiltration started in Agar Low Viscosity resin (Agar, Stansted, Essex, UK). After embedding and polymerization of the resin, ribbons of serial sections were conducted with a Diatome HistoJumbo diamond knife (Diatome, Switzerland). Sections were stained with toluidine blue, sealed and afterwards photographed and analysed with a Nikon NiU compound microscope equipped with a Nikon DsRi2 microscope camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Serial sections were converted into greyscale using FIJI43 and afterwards imported into the 3D visualization software Amira (Thermo Fisher). Images were aligned using the AlignSlices module of Amira. Afterwards, virtual sections of the CT stack of the parasitized and reconstructed specimen were placed using the histological sections as reference in order to compare the CT information with the histological details.

The government of the Netherlands authorized admission and rehabilitation procedure of different seal species at the Sealcentre Pieterburen (permission ID at time of sample-taking: FF/75/2012/015).

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Leidenberger, S., Harding, K. & Härkönen, T. Phocid seals, seal lice and heartworms: a terrestrial host–parasite system conveyed to the marine environment. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 77, 235–253 (2007).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Leidenberger, S. & Boström, S. Characterization of the heartworm Acanthocheilonema spirocauda (Leidy, 1858) Anderson, 1992 (Nematoda: Onchocercidae) in Scandinavia. Parasitol. Res. 104, 63–67 (2008).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Papadopoulos, E., Loukopoulos, P., Komnenou, A., Androukaki, E. & Karamanlidis, A. A. First report of Acanthocheilonema spirocauda in the Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus). J. Wildl. Dis. 46, 570–573 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Borgsteede, F. H. M., Bus, H. G. J., Verplanke, J. A. W. & van Burg, W. P. J. Endoparasitic helminths of the harbour seal, Phoca vitulina, in the Netherlands. Neth. J. Sea Res. 28, 247–250 (1991).

Article Google Scholar

Lehnert, K., Raga, J. A. & Siebert, U. Parasites in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) from the German Wadden Sea between two Phocine Distemper Virus epidemics. Helgol. Mar. Res. 61, 239–245 (2007).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Lehnert, K., Schwanke, E., Hahn, K., Wohlsein, P. & Siebert, U. Heartworm (Acanthocheilonema spirocauda) and seal louse (Echinophthirius horridus) infections in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) from the North and Baltic Seas. J. Sea Res. 113, 65–72 (2016).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Claussen, D. et al. The Helminth Fauna from the Common Seal (Phoca vitulina vitulina, Linné, 1758) of the Wadden Sea in Lower Saxony. Part 2: Nematodes. J. Vet. Med. B 38, 649–656 (1991).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lunneryd, S. G. Dipetalonema spirocauda (Leidy) (Nematoda) and Corynosoma strumosum (Rudolphi) (Acanthocephala) infection in harbour seal from the Kattegat-Skagerrak and the Baltic. Sarsia 76, 267–271 (1992).

Article Google Scholar

Measures, L. N., Gosselin, J. F. & Bergeron, E. Heartworm, Acanthocheilonema spirocauda (Leidy, 1858), infections in Canadian phocid seals. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54, 842–846 (1997).

Article Google Scholar

Dunn, J. L. & Wolke, R. E. Dipetalonema spirocauda infection in the Atlantic harbor seal (Phoca vitulina concolor). J. Wildl. Dis. 12, 531–538 (1976).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wülker, G. Über Nematoden aus Nordseetieren. I. Zool. Anz. 87/88, 293–302 (1930).

Google Scholar

Leonardi, M. S. & Palma, R. L. Review of the systematics, biology and ecology of lice from pinnipeds and river otters (Insecta: Phthiraptera: Anoplura: Echinophthiriidae). Zootaxa 3630, 445–466 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Kim, K. C. & Ludwig, H. W. The family classification of the Anoplura. Syst. Entomol. 3, 249–284 (1978).

Article Google Scholar

Jellison, W. L. & Milner, K. C. Salmonellosis (bacillary dysentery) of fur seals. J. Wildl. Manag. 22, 199–200 (1958).

Article Google Scholar

Morick, D., Osinga, N., Gruys, E. & Harrus, S. Identification of a Bartonella species in the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) and in seal lice (Echinophthirius horridus). Vector-Borne Zoonot. 9, 751–753 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Boyd, B. M. et al. Two bacterial genera, Sodalis and Rickettsia, associated with the seal louse Proechinophthirus fluctus (Phthiraptera: Anoplura). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 3185–3197 (2016).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hirzmann, J. et al. The seal louse (Echinophthirius horridus) in the Dutch Wadden Sea: investigation of vector-borne pathogens. Parasite. Vector. 14, 96 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Otranto, D. et al. Vector-borne helminths of dogs and humans in Europe. Parasite. Vector. 6, 16 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Risch, F., Ritter, M., Hoerauf, A. & Hübner, M. P. Human filariasis—contributions of the Litomosoides sigmodontis and Acanthocheilonema viteae animal model. Parasitol. Res. 120, 4125–4143 (2021).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Nelson, G. S. Dipetalonema dracunculoides (Cobbold, 1870), from the dog in Kenya: with a note on its development in the louse-fly Hippobosca longipennis. J. Helminthol. 37, 235–240 (1963).

Article Google Scholar

Pennington, N. E. & Phelps, C. A. Canine filariasis on Okinawa, Ryukyu islands. J. Med. Entomol. 6, 59–67 (1969).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kuzmina, T. A., Kuzmin, Y. I., Tkach, V. V., Spraker, T. R. & Lyons, E. T. Ecological, morphological, and molecular studies of Acanthocheilonema odendhali (Nematoda: Filarioidea) in northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) on St. Paul Island, Alaska. Parasitol. Res. 112, 3091–3100 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Taylor, A. E. R., Brown, D. H., Heyneman, D. & McIntyre, R. W. Biology of filarioid nematode Dipetalonema spirocauda (Leidy, 1858) from the heart of captive harbour seals and sea lions, together with pathology of the hosts. J. Parasitol. 47, 971–976 (1961).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Geraci, J. R., Fortin, J. F., St. Aubin, D. J. & Hicks, B. D. The seal louse, Echinophthirius horridus: an intermediate host of the seal heartworm, Dipetalonema spirocauda (Nematoda). Can. J. Zool. 59, 1457–1459 (1981).

Article Google Scholar

Dailey, M. D. & Fallace, L. S. Prevalence of parasites in a wild population of the Pacific harbour seal (Phoca vitulina richardsi) from Gray’s Harbor, Washington. Bull. South Calif. Acad. Sci. 88, 1–10 (1989).

Google Scholar

Keroack, C. D. et al. A novel quantitative real-time PCR diagnostic assay for seal heartworm (Acanthocheilonema spirocauda) provides evidence for possible infection in the grey seal (Halichoerus grypus). Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 7, 147–154 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Spratt, D. M. Natural occurrence, histopathology and developmental stages of Dirofilaria roemeri in the intermediate host. Int. J. Parasitol. 2, 201–208 (1972).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Martín-Vega, D. et al. 3D virtual histology at the host/parasite interface: visualisation of the master manipulator, Dicrocoelium dendriticum, in the brain of its ant host. Sci. Rep. 8, 8587 (2018).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar

Hall, M. J. R. et al. Micro-CT visualization of a promastigote secretory gel (PSG) and parasite plug in the digestive tract of the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis infected with Leishmania mexicana. Plos Neglect. Trop. D. 15, e0009682 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hall, M. J. R. et al. Micro-CT imaging of Onchocerca infection of Simulium damnosum s.l. blackflies and comparison of the peritrophic membrane thickness of forest and savannah flies. Med. Vet. Entomol. 35, 231–238 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Yoshimura, H. et al. Sarcoptes scabiei var. hominis: three-dimensional structure of a female imago and crusted scabies lesions by X-ray micro-CT. Exp. Parasitol. 122, 268–272 (2009).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, J. D. B. et al. X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT): an emerging opportunity in parasite imaging. Parasitology 145, 848–854 (2018).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Casiraghi, M., Anderson, T. J. C., Bandi, C., Bazzocchi, C. & Genchi, C. A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts. Parasitology 122, 93–103 (2001).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Alho, A. M. et al. Dirofilaria immitis in pinnipeds and a new host record. Parasite. Vector. 10, 142 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Manfredi, M. T., Di Cerbo, A. & Genchi, M. Biology of filarial worms parasitizing dogs and cats. Mappe Parassitologiche 8, 40–45 (2007).

Google Scholar

Kuzmin, Y., Varodi, E., Vasylyk, N. & Kononko, G. Experimental infection of mosquitoes with Dirofilaria repens (Nematoda, Filarioidea) larvae. Vestn. Zool. 39, 19–24 (2005).

Google Scholar

Erickson, S. M. et al. Mosquito infection responses to developing filarial worms. Plos Neglect. Trop. D. 3, e529 (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Paily, K. P., Hoti, S. L. & Das, P. K. A review of the complexity of biology of lymphatic filarial parasites. J. Parasit. Dis. 33, 3–12 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Perrone, J. B. & Spielman, A. Microfilarial perforation of the midgut of a mosquito. J. Parasitol. 72(5), 723–727. https://doi.org/10.2307/3281463 (1986).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Thompson, P. M., Corpe, H. M. & Reid, R. J. Prevalence and intensity of the ectoparasite Echinophthirius horridus on harbour seals (Phoca vitulina): effects of host age and inter-annual variability in host food availability. Parasitology 117, 393–403 (1998).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Farriols, M. et al. Filarial infections in California sea lions vary spatially within the Gulf of California, Mexico. Parasitol. Res. 119, 1281–1290 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Metscher, B. D. MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues. BMC Physiol. 9, 11 (2009).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Sealcentre Pieterburen during sample taking procedures. Further we would like to thank Annika Seipp (Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Justus Liebig University Giessen) for the assistance during scanning electron microscopy. This research was supported using resources of the VetCore Facility (VetImaging) of the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna. This study is dedicated to Madita, a lighthearted and nature-loving young girl, enthusiastic about marine animals and a true inspiration for her father.

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Institute of Parasitology, Biomedical Research Center Seltersberg, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Schubertstr. 81, 35392, Giessen, Germany

David Ebmer, Anja Taubert & Carlos Hermosilla

VetCore Facility for Research, Imaging Unit, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria

Stephan Handschuh & Martin Glösmann

Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, 1030, Vienna, Austria

Thomas Schwaha

Sealcentre Pieterburen, Hoofdstraat 94a, 9968 AG, Pieterburen, The Netherlands

Ana Rubio-García

Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Aulweg 123, 35385, Giessen, Germany

Ulrich Gärtner

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

C.H. and D.E. designed and conceptualized the study. D.E. prepared samples, analyzed data, drafted the manuscript and prepared figures. S.H. conducted X-ray microCT analyses and analyzed data sets. T.S. conducted histological analyses. A.R-G. conducted and supervised sample-taking process. U.G. conducted scanning electron microscopy. M.G. and A.T. critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript prior to submission.

Correspondence to David Ebmer.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Video 1.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Ebmer, D., Handschuh, S., Schwaha, T. et al. Novel 3D in situ visualization of seal heartworm (Acanthocheilonema spirocauda) larvae in the seal louse (Echinophthirius horridus) by X-ray microCT. Sci Rep 12, 14078 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18418-y

Download citation

Received: 07 June 2022

Accepted: 10 August 2022

Published: 18 August 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18418-y

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.